I like the Garmin devices cause they're so much simpler and does the specific built in sports functionality very very well. If I cared about that kind of thing I'd be wearing an Apple Watch. When I tried Connect IQ the apps rarely did anything I much cared about. Right now I'm not sure if any of them even support Connect IQ. It will be interesting to see what effect (if any) this will or will not have on the CiQ tooling and the CiQ ecosystem. Now, both companies are closing the gap in both directions on many of these aspects. The early CiQ SDK versions had some truly insane conventions like using constants named “THAI_SPICY_HOT” for font sizes, and the development platform (as others have noted in this thread) has always been a barely functional tool chain with minimal error handling, no compiler optimization, no debugger, simulators that don’t match the device ROMs, etc etc.įor a long time this didn’t really matter since the Apple Watch and Garmin devices really appealed to two very different market segments - Garmin had a huge moat in first party fitness capabilities, maps, and battery life, and Apple had a huge moat in UX, their app ecosystem, the screen quality and device style, and smartwatch functionality. My sense, as someone who has written more than one CiQ app is that Garmin got caught completely by surprise with the popularity of 3rd party apps on wearable platforms and Monke圜 graduated from “interesting side project” to “critical ecosystem capability” in the space of a couple months, years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |